It’s always good to compare. A major issue here in the 13th District is the Dominion power line. This will be my last post for a while until election day but visit my web site [ www.electroemmelt.org ] to get the latest info on my campaign to unseat Bob Marshall.
Below are two perspectives on the powerline, but from the self published copies of our testimony to the State Corporation Commission.
Decide for your self who’s on what side of the issues. Seems to me that if you are against something you could use word like “Oppose” of “Stop”…
MY TESIMONY
Testimony of Bruce Roemmelt
Delivered to the Commonwealth of Virginia
State Corporation Commission Hearing on August 10, 2007
RE: the Application #PUE-2007-00031 of Dominion Resources
to build a 500 Kilovolt power line
My name is Bruce Roemmelt and I live at 2666 Collins Court, in Prince William County. I’m also on the Board of Directors of the Bull Run Mountain Estates Civic Association.
A reading from Proverbs tells us, “Without vision, the people will perish.”
I am here to oppose Dominion’s power line proposal and talk about how a vision can help us through this. But I want to address my opposition to the proposal based on changing the dialogue from the perspective of impact if it is built, to rethinking the proposed actual need for these impacts to be addressed in the first place.
We should have new purpose – developing and implementing a vision of how we address our energy policies – which will lead to a very important outcome: it will determine how our children will evaluate the actions and decisions made as a result of this process.
We have chosen to be reactive when our energy production, transmission and usage paradigm should be proactive. Perhaps in some small way this entire controversy might finally spark our Commonwealth to lead the way to an energy policy with vision that does not just depend on consume – build, consume - build, consume – build and consume.
Continuing our current paradigm will always find us behind and in real danger of perishing.
The obvious parallel to our lack of energy vision is the growth and transportation mess we have in our area. We have no vision to which we have demonstrated the courage to commit.
We currently have 50 thousand houses that can be built tomorrow in Prince William and Loudoun with no infrastructure improvements.
We need to be developing that vision and then be courageous in our implementation.
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, in his famous dissent with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, stated…
“It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.”
We here in the Commonwealth need to summon that courage, especially in light of the tremendous power that Dominion Resources has gained in Richmond by showering thousands of campaign contribution dollars and fancy high-priced Redskins box seats on our politicians.
The issue should not be how we can minimize the proposed power line’s impact on conservation easements, view shed, property rights, health risks, the incredible national parks that can never be replaced, the economic loss to those adjacent to the line, protection from terrorism, whether we can bury such a monstrosity using technology that has not yet been invented, and squandering energy produced from ever diminishing fuel sources, but how can we change our lives, just a little bit, to eliminate the need for this project.
Dominion wants us to focus on the issues that will raise their ugly heads after the line is approved. They and their supporters are playing a classic “whack a mole” game with us. Don’t like proposed route A – ok we’ll change to B (or C or D). Don’t like overhead lines – perhaps we can bury them. It’s the Feds, no, the State, no, local governments that are to blame – oh wait it’s the consumers. And all the while Virginia has nearly the lowest investment in demand management of all the 50 states.
I want to focus on how we can avert the need for this project in the first place by making the most of existing energy saving technology and techniques.
I’m not here to dispute Dominion’s estimated peak energy demand ten years out, but I will accept those reams of figures as one tool with which to work and build my argument against this proposal.
If Dominion states the peak demand is “X” and we reduce “X” by ten to fifteen percentage points in ten years we will have eliminated the need for this power line.
It is also disturbing to note in the 50 megabyte Dominion Application Appendix file on the SCC website, there is a BRIEF analysis of 12 alternatives to the 500 Kilovolt line BUT each one was rejected as a solution individually. There was NO analysis of one or more of these alternatives taken together to avert this environmental, cultural, and economic disaster.
My belief is that Dominion is probably elated with all of the band aids being proposed to deal with the project when again I state that the question should not be how do we best build the power line, but how can we avoid building the power line?
I am a retired fire fighter from Prince William County and over the 40 plus years I’ve been running into burning buildings and responding to auto accidents and heart attacks one lesson is more obvious that all the rest.
Prevention is the most important key to reducing risk and damage. Preventative health care leads to longer life and reduced time being sick. Fire prevention and automatic sprinklers reduce and often eliminate serious catastrophe.
We need to be courageous and develop a “prevention policy” now and be intrepid in its implementation.
Which brings me to the solutions that I have not invented – but which I fully support – that will take us to where we can live safely and happily in our communities.
The Piedmont Environmental Council has commissioned a study that has already been introduced into evidence at these hearings. The study, called Summit Blue, proposes several initiatives that will address the energy vision that we need to have in the Commonwealth.
Our political leaders need to use this comprehensive analysis and its recommendations as the blueprint for developing a state energy policy that will show dramatic results in two to three years.
Since you all have the entire report I will just hit the high points that will allow us to develop our energy vision and implement it. And the beauty of this proposal is that Dominion will be afforded excellent opportunities to maintain income levels even as power consumption is reduced.
Blue Summit examines at the demand side management alternatives previously dismissed by Dominion in their appendix.
- Residential and Commercial High-Efficiency Lighting Programs
- Residential HVAC Retrofit and Quality Installation Programs
- Residential and Commercial New Construction Programs
- Residential and Commercial High-Efficiency Appliance/Office Equipment Programs
- Commercial Data Center Efficiency Programs
It is also important to realize that each of these programs provides financial incentives and education to end-use customers to participate, AND in light of the re-regulation bills passed in the last General Assembly session, has the following inducements for Dominion:
- Provides incentives for utilities to find renewable forms of energy and establish demand-side management and conservation programs;
- Allows each utility to seek rate adjustment clauses to recover costs of FERC-approved demand response programs and costs of providing incentives for the utility to design and implement demand-side management programs; and
- Directs the SCC to “conduct a proceeding to establish goals for the amount of energy and demand to be reduced by the operation of demand side management, conservation, energy efficiency, and load management programs, and develop a plan for the development and implementation of recommended programs.”
These opportunities, along with the Blue Summit recommendations will allow the Commonwealth to develop and implement an energy policy vision that will not only eliminate the need for this power line, but will put us in the forefront of energy management in the entire country.
It can be done. When my twenty year old heat pump went out I replaced it with an Energy Star certified unit that cut my electric consumption by 30%. I’ve installed several compact fluorescent bulbs and I turn stuff off when it’s not being used. My coffeemaker even brews into a thermal, insulated carafe that requires no electricity whatsoever AND keeps my coffee hot four times longer.
An appropriate application of technology and technique will save us, and when we’re at the top of the nation in energy conservation instead of the bottom, we will have done something significant not only for ourselves, but also for those that will follow us.
We cannot depend on the Federal government to solve these problems. The mess of national energy policy, immigration, health care and OTHER issues calls out to us to build one of Justice Brandeis’ laboratories that “try novel social and economic experiments”.
I implore the SCC to listen to the people.
I urge the SCC to recommend the building of such a laboratory here in the Commonwealth.
I know we can find the courage to prevail.
Just listen to the passion and testimony given here already by my neighbors.
We need a vision for energy and we do not want to perish.
Bruce Roemmelt
MARSHALL TESTIMONY
Testimony, Delegate Bob Marshall, State Corporation Commission, August 09, 2007, Bristow VirginiaLast fall, after I wrote several thousand of my constituents about a public meeting hosted by Virginia Power on the construction of a proposed 550 KV electric power through portions of Prince William and Loudoun Counties, I attended the public information meeting at George Mason University’s Manassas Campus.
There, Dominion officials, specifically an engineer told me that it would not be technically feasible or indeed even technically possible to use existing power line right of ways for this proposed power line. I asked why. I was told that I would have to take it on his word that it was not possible. I sought an explanation, and was given a conclusion.
Now, we see that it is the existing power line right of way that is the alleged preferred route for the new power line expansion. So what was technically impossible last Fall, is eminently feasible in August, 2007. I am not an engineer, but it is because of responses like this have raised considerable concern among the hundreds of constituents who have communicated their concerns to me over this proposal.
As a state representative I am asking you to go back and examine the public needs statements made by Dominion when the initial announcements came out for this proposal with the statements made today by Dominion.
As a state representative, I am asking you, the State Corporation Commission to thoroughly and if necessary independently examine or seek outside competent technical expertise and have them examine the assumptions the assumptions operative with the initial Dominion proposal before their filing with the SCC, and those that are now prevalent in the current application.
Some of these would include the alleged factual situation and assumption then as well as statements by Dominion then and now that Dominion:
(1) didn’t want to use a longer route because of expense, but that’s what is now proposed;
(2) didn’t want a longer route because of energy losses, but again that’s what is proposed;
(3) had a number of viable alternate routes, but now has only 1 alternative that must be negotiated with VDOT;
(4) has a good conservation and demand reduction program, but nearly 3 months after submitting the application announces formation of an energy conservation group within the company to encourage renewed customer interest in energy efficiency and to explore pilot programs;
(5) would use the state process to gain approval of its application and did not intend to make use of the new Federal backstop authority, and now won’t comment on what might happen if the application is denied.
It took the General Assembly two years to develop an approach to equitable addressing the eminent domain concerns raised by the Kelo Decision of the US Supreme Court. Under newly passed Virginia law this year any public utility has a high burden of proof that any taking of private real property is really necessary for the construction of high voltage power lines. Here is the new law language:
“The right to private property being a fundamental right … No more private property may be taken than that which is necessary to achieve the stated public use … During condemnation proceedings, the property owner may challenge whether the taking or damaging is for a public use, the stated public use is a pretext for an unauthorized use … Nothing in this section shall be construed as abrogating any defenses or rights otherwise available to the property owner independently of this section. (See HB 2954)
If the SCC approves a route that involves any considerable new takings of property, I am suggesting to you that unless Dominion can prove that there were no viable alternatives to erecting a new massive 550 KV power line such as energy conservation, smaller power generating stations nearer to Northern Virginia Consumers, and similar concerns that any such route selection will be subject to profound eminent domain litigation on the need for the takings.
Lastly, there is the statute I authored this year which gives local governments the right to assign power line corridors for 150+ KV power lines. My statute provides that:
“If the local comprehensive plan of an affected county or municipality designates corridors or routes for electric transmission lines and the line is proposed to be constructed outside such corridors or routes, in any hearing the county or municipality may provide adequate evidence that the existing planned corridors or routes designated in the plan can adequately serve the needs of the company. Additionally, the Commission shall consider, upon the request of the governing body of any county or municipality in which the line is proposed to be constructed, (i) the costs and economic benefits likely to result from requiring the underground placement of the line and (ii) any potential impediments to timely construction of the line. (HB 3031)
This wording received the agreement of Dominion Power, Allegheny Power and local governments across Virginia. The words, “any potential impediments to timely construction of the line” includes likely litigation resulting from route selection,
which is more or less likely depending on the route selected.
You have a job cut out for you, but the Citizens of Virginia have through their legislature, placed their confidence in you to exercise thorough and responsible oversight regarding this most important matter. Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
choose wisely on November 6th!
b